<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One law for you, one law for me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pandammonium.org/blogs/pandammonium/2008/02/08/one-law-for-you-one-law-for-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pandammonium.org/blogs/pandammonium/2008/02/08/one-law-for-you-one-law-for-me/</link>
	<description>The world that revolves around Caity Ross</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pandammonium</title>
		<link>http://pandammonium.org/blogs/pandammonium/2008/02/08/one-law-for-you-one-law-for-me/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>pandammonium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pandammonium.org/blogs/pandammonium/2008/02/08/one-law-for-you-one-law-for-me/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>And that &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; saying something!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that <em>is</em> saying something!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTM</title>
		<link>http://pandammonium.org/blogs/pandammonium/2008/02/08/one-law-for-you-one-law-for-me/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>FTM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pandammonium.org/blogs/pandammonium/2008/02/08/one-law-for-you-one-law-for-me/#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>The whole of the British legal system is based around the concept of a single set of laws for all persons. Changing this would be an act of crass stupidity. Anyway, why the dickens should anybody take anything seriously if it comes out of the mouth of a person who holds supernatural beliefs? David Brent talks more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole of the British legal system is based around the concept of a single set of laws for all persons. Changing this would be an act of crass stupidity. Anyway, why the dickens should anybody take anything seriously if it comes out of the mouth of a person who holds supernatural beliefs? David Brent talks more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.337 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
